In response to public suggestions sought by the parliamentary panel examining the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2016, the delegation of over 150 activists said the bill will result in "discrimination" and "violence" towards the transgender community.
Arguing that the bill has narrowed down the definition of transgenders by taking away the right of self-determination, the activists alleged that the screening process to certify a person as transgender would violate a person's dignity.
"There are different levels of marginalisation. A person cannot be simply put under OBC category. There is a need for separate reservation policy for transgenders," Chayanika, a queer rights activist, said.
Terming their objections to the bill as "non-negotiable", they said the bill needs to be redrafted after deliberations and in depth consultations with the transgender and intersex communities.
"The current bill of 2016 has grossly undermined NALSA judgement to such an extent that we strongly believe that it will result in further discrimination and violence towards the transgender community. We insist government to allow us a minimum period of 30 days to provide a cohesive list of objections to the bill," the delegation said in a letter to Standing Committee on Social Justice and Empowerment.
The Transgender Bill was referred to Standing Committee on Social Justice after being introduced in Lok Sabha in monsoon session amid criticism from a section of the transgender community.
Standing committee then invited public consultations citing wider implications of the proposed bill.
"Considering the wider implications of the proposed legislation for protection of the rights of transgender persons and for an in-depth study of the proposals in the bill, the standing committee decided to invite suggestions... From the public in general and from NGOs," a statement released by Lok Sabha had read.
The recent bill is a redrafted version of the "Rights of Transgender Persons Bill 2015", following the direction of the 2014 NALSA judgement by the Supreme Court of India, wherein the apex court had directed the government to draft policies to redress the inequities and rights violations faced by India's transgender communities.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
