At a panel discussion here on the Nehruvian ideals of 'Justice', Dikshit left Salman Khurshid, a Congress heavyweight, stumped with his questions as he also accused the party of having taken a "contradictory" stand on the issue of economic growth and environment protection.
"FCRA was a law brought by us. Why is it that FCRA was changed to make it more and more difficult for organisations that question the government. We today say that this (NDA) government does not allow questions... Congress started that trend; we can't only blame the BJP for action against Greenpeace," Dikshit said.
In a bid to play down the remarks, Khurshid, who held the External Affairs portfolio in the previous UPA government, nudged Dikshit to talk to "Mr (P) Chidambaram over lunch". The former finance minister was also present in the audience.
"Sir, I am sorry but your answer has given me the answer," was Dikshit's response to Khurshid.
On the issue of environment, Dikshit, a former East Delhi MP, said that Congress could not resolve the contradiction between environment protection and growth despite enacting major laws on shielding the nature from adverse impact of development.
"Were those Acts wrong or was there an issue that we could not settle? Why is it that the PM (Manmohan Singh) was forced to make statements on one line? You are PM, you are the government, if you believe the environment laws are wrong, change them.
"If you believe growth is anti-environment, then convince us that that was so," he said.
Deputy Director of environment NGO CSE, Chandra Bhushan, Dalit rights activist Wilson Bezwada, JNU professor Archana Prasad and DU professor Aditya Narayan Mishra were the other panelists at the session.
Greenpeace India yesterday said that its registration to operate in the country had been cancelled, alleging that it marked yet another action as part of a crackdown on NGOs.
Claiming that its registration as a society has been cancelled by the Registrar of Societies in Tamil Nadu, Greenpeace India had alleged that the action was an extension of the "deep intolerance" for differing viewpoints which the government was "harbouring" and asserted that it would seek legal "redress".
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)