SC asks petitioner to move HC for probe in a bridge collapse

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Sep 16 2016 | 5:48 PM IST
The Supreme Court today asked a petitioner, seeking probe into alleged negligence in the collapse of a British-era bridge on Mumbai-Goa highway during heavy rains on August 2 claiming 22 lives, to raise it before the Bombay High Court.
A bench of Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justice A M Khanwilkar directed the petitioner to approach the High Court with the PIL which seeks direction for "investigation into corruption involved in maintenance of the bridge".
The plea filed by Pranay Baliram Sawant through advocate R D Upadhaya has also urged the apex court to issue directions for disciplinary action against "corrupt officials responsible for conducting false/fake audit and thereby filing misleading report."
It also sought a direction to the state government to produce documentary records of audit of expenses incurred in maintaining the bridge in Raigad district of Konkan area in Maharashtra.
The PIL has alleged that "the bridge on the Mumbai-Goa highway linking Mahad and Poladpur collapsed in Raigad district in Konkan during heavy rains leading to mass murder of innocent people which did not occur due to rain but due to complete negligence of state machinery in not utilising the funds in safety and maintenance of the bridge."
"That as per the audit report of May 2016, the collapsed bridge has been declared to be fit and if the records of fitness are not called and investigation in depth not carried out, then other bridges of British era all over the country are also at the risk of collapse," the plea said citing an example of collapse of a 44-year-old bridge in Kangra district of Himachal Pradesh.
Two buses had been swept away in the swollen Savitri River after the bridge collapsed on August 2 around midnight in Raigad district around 170 Km from Mumbai.
The plea alleged that state government authorities have been maintaining the bridge only on paper but not in the real sense which led to its collapse.
Had the government officers responsible for safety and maintenance of the collapsed bridge put up any sign over the bridge before the entry/exit points, several innocent lives could have been saved.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 16 2016 | 5:48 PM IST

Next Story