SC issues notice to selected candidates of DJS exams 2014

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 06 2015 | 8:13 PM IST
The Supreme Court today sought response from the successful candidates of the Delhi Judicial Services examinations held last year on a plea alleging arbitrary evaluation of answer scripts.
A bench of Justices Dipak Misra and P C Pant said it would like to hear the 15 candidates, who were selected for the interview, before appointing a former apex court judge re-evaluate all answersheets and issued notices to them.
"Principle of natural justice demands that the successful students be heard as we have decided to re-evaluate all answer scripts...Parity is the test," the bench said while posting the matter for next hearing on December 9.
On November 2, the bench had suggested to have a former apex court judge for rational re-evaluatation of all the answersheets of the Delhi judicial services examinations held in 2014.
The court was hearing a PIL filed by NGO Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) alleging arbitrary evaluation of answer papers in the judicial services examinations held in 2014.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for CPIL, had said that 659 students out of 9033, who were declared successful in preliminary examination, took the main examination held on October 10 and 11 last year.
"The result of this Main Examination was declared on May 1 2015, almost 8 months after the exam was held. Surprisingly, only 15 students (13 from General Category and 2 from reserved category) have been selected for the interview for total 80 vacancies. That means a total of 98 per cent of the students were failed and only 2 per cent managed to pass," Bhushan had said.
He had said that only 15 students have been called for the interview against 80 vacancies becomes "remarkable" as there are at least 68 candidates, who were not selected for the interview round, are "those who have already cleared judicial examinations of other States and most of them are sitting judges in their respective states".
CPIL had sought a direction to "quash the result of the Main Exam of the Delhi Judicial Service, 2014 declared on May one.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 06 2015 | 8:13 PM IST

Next Story