A bench comprising Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Prafulla C Pant dismissed the petition filed against an order of Madurai Bench of the High Court which had said that names of lawyers or judges should not be published or broadcast as it amounted to indirect advertisement of their professional capabilities.
"We do not find any legal and valid ground for the interference," the court said while dismissing the plea filed by advocate S Baskar Mathuram.
The high court judgment was passed while dismissing a public interest litigation filed by an advocate, seeking compensation for five Dalit children who were booked under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act by Madurai District Police on August 7.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
