SC sets aside Bom HC order for FIR agnst Haryana cops

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 17 2016 | 9:57 PM IST
The Supreme Court today set aside the Bombay High Court decision ordering registration of an FIR against some Haryana cops who were allegedly involved in the shootout of gangster Sandeep Gadoli in a Mumbai suburb hotel.
A bench of justices V Gopala Gowda and Arun Mishra allowed the appeal of Haryana governmment on the issue.
The plea of Haryana was put forth by Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi.
The Bombay High Court had on February 15 directed the Mumbai police to register an FIR into the alleged encounter by the Gurgaon police at a hotel there on February 7.
The Haryana government had said the High Court had passed the order without even making the concerned police officials as parties to the plea filed by the brother of the slain alleged gangster.
It further alleged that the impugned order was "ex-parte, illegal and erroneous" one.
"Vide the impugned order, the registration of an FIR has been ordered against the officials of the petitioner herein, merely on the basis of the consensual statement given by the public prosecutor of Mumbai," the plea had said.
It had said a search operation was carried out by the police officials to nab notorious gangster Sandeep Gadoli of Gurgaon in Haryana who was involved in as many as 40 FIRs since 1999.
"The said gangster was presently wanted in eight FIRs registered for heinous crimes in Haryana alone, out of which in three FIRs, he was declared proclaimed offender. There was a reward of Rs one lakh on the head of the aforesaid gangster by Haryana Police," the plea had further said.
It had said the state officials were only discharging their official duties at the time of the aforesaid incident and carrying out a meticulous operation which lasted for almost 48 hours to nab a notorious gangster which can be verified and cannot be said to be a "fake encounter".
"Consequently, the direction for registration of FIR against the police officials of the petitioner state is not only demoralising but shocking for the entire police machinery of the state. As such, if the second FIR will be registered against the innocent police officers of the petitioner, it will be causing undue harassment and embarrassment to them," the plea had said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 17 2016 | 9:57 PM IST

Next Story