Besides, the firm and its directors have been barred from the capital market for four years. Further, they have also been restrained from money from investors by launching any collective investment schemes (CIS).
The regulator found that Pancard Clubs mobilised Rs 7,035 crore from 51,55,516 investors from 2002-03 to 2013-14 through its various holiday schemes.
The latest order comes after Securities and Appellate Tribunal (SAT) in September 2014 had asked Sebi to pass a fresh order after examining all documents. The tribunal had also set aside Sebi's interim order that had barred Pancard Clubs from raising funds from public as well as launching any new scheme.
The regulator directed Pancard Clubs and its directors -- Sudhir Shankar Morvekar, Shoba Ratnakar Barde, Usha Arun Tari, Manish Kalidas Gandhi, Chandrasen Ganpatrao Bhise and Ramachandran Ramakrishnan -- to wind up the existing CIS and refund the money collected by the firm under the schemes with returns which are due to its investors within three months.
Thereafter within a period of 15 days, the firm will have to submit a winding up as well repayment report to Sebi.
In case the firm fails to comply with the order, the entities will continue to be barred from the market, even after the completion of four years of restrictions imposed on them "till all the collective investment schemes are wound up and all the money mobilized through such schemes are refunded to its investors with returns which are due to them."
Further, it would make a reference to state government/ local police and register a civil/criminal case against the company and would make a reference to Corporate Affairs Ministry to initiate the process of winding up of the firm.
According to SAT, Pancard Clubs has been knocking on the doors of Sebi since 2001 by seeking its decision on the question as to whether the time sharing business carried on by the company is covered under CIS or not, although no formal order was issued in the year 2001.
"It is now admitted by counsel for Sebi that since the very beginning Sebi was of the opinion that time sharing business is not covered under CIS."
"In fact, in 2010, Sebi once again scrutinized the documents relating to the business carried on by the appellant and it is evident from the letter addressed by Sebi to a Member of Parliament (MP) on October 21, 2013 that even after scrutiny of documents furnished by appellant in 2010 Sebi was of the opinion that the time sharing business carried on by the appellant was not covered under CIS," SAT had said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
