Taking benefit from the regulatory gaps, some depository participants enter into tripartite arrangements with the promoters of listed companies and the traders for lending or borrowing of shares without using the formal pledging or encumbrance of such securities.
However, such arrangements can lead to possible frauds and multiple pledging of shares and there have been cases where any default on part of any of the three parties has resulted into a massive fall in the share price -- thus hurting the interest of minority shareholders.
To check this menace, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) is now looking into a proposal to bar the depository participants (DPs) from entering into such arrangements, a senior official said.
The DPs in the Indian stock market include stock brokers, registrar and transfer agents and NBFCs. They act as intermediaries between the depository and the investors, who need to open their demat accounts with these DPs for trading.
A recommendation in this regard has also been made by the Sebi's Depository System Review Committee and the regulator has sought comments from the two depositories -- NSDL and CDSL -- after discussing these recommendations, the official added.
This panel, comprising of independent experts and Sebi officials, is tasked with the mandate to conduct overall assessment and adequacy of existing depository framework and identify areas for review.
It also identifies areas for improvement of systems, procedures and practices and suggest necessary changes.
The panel has noted that certain depository participants "allow the promoters of companies to use tripartite agreements usually referred to as Non-Disposal Agreement/Non-Disposal Undertaking (NDU) to extend facilities to its clients for lending or borrowing of shares instead of following the pledging facility available in the depository system.
Consequently, it recommended that "DPs should not be party to such arrangements as there is no regulatory mechanism whereby depositories and DPs can treat shares covered by NDU as pledged or encumbered, leading to potential for fraud and multiple pledging".
Sebi has earlier also sought to check the NDU menace by putting in place a stronger set of disclosure norms for pledging of shares by the promoters of the company, wherein they were asked to disclose all kinds of pledging or encumbrance through such NDUs.
However, many entities have been avoiding such disclosures and those cases have come to the notice of the regulators only after complaints or during some probes.
An NDU typically involves shares being transferred to a new demat account without change in the beneficial ownership with an undertaking that the transferee would not sell those shares. At times, special purpose vehicles are floated to such share transfers to avoid making any disclosures.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)