Shatrughan questions Arunachal Pradesh Prez Rule decision

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 30 2016 | 1:57 PM IST
Disgruntled BJP MP Shatrughan Sinha today criticised the Centre's decision to impose President's Rule in Arunachal Pradesh, saying "heavens would not have fallen" if the government had waited for the Supreme Court's decision on the matter.
The 70-year old BJP MP from Patna Sahib also took potshots at Prime Minister Narendra Modi's "great advisors", wondering what answers will they have if the Supreme Court ruled against it.
"We should have been more cautious and alert when the matter is in the Supreme Court. I think heavens would not have fallen if we had waited for the decision of the Supreme Court. This could have saved us from embarassment and controversy," Sinha, who has been at variance with the party leadership over a host of issues, said after making a series of tweets on the issue.
He told PTI over phone from Pune that "Narendra Modi is a well meaning Prime Minister. Its the advisors who sometimes give faulty opinion which leads to wrong political moves (which are) certainly not good for health of the party and the government."
When asked that his views were contrary to that of the party and smacked of dissidence, Sinha said "I have always called a spade a spade. My personal views sometimes may not match with our people. But, my opinion is always intended for good of the party and the nation."
"I hope wish and pray, they will accept my sincerity and loyalty towards the party," the actor-turned-politician said.
Earlier in the day, Sinha had tweeted on the microblogging site: "I have tremendous faith in our dashing, dynamic action hero PM. But wonder who the 'great' advisors are who advised President's Rule in Arunachal Pradesh. That too when the matter is sub judice, in the Supreme Court, under a 5 judge constitutional bench. Wonder what was the hurry and worry."
"God forbid, if the decision does not go in our favor, wonder what explanation and answer we will have for our respected PM," Sinha had also said.
The Centre had yesterday submitted an affidavit in the Supreme Court justifying imposition of President's Rule, saying there was "complete breakdown" of governance and law and order in the state where the Governor and his family apprehended "grave danger to their lives" every day.
President Pranab Mukherjee had earlier this week given assent to the Union Cabinet's decision to impose central rule in Arunachal Pradesh.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 30 2016 | 1:57 PM IST

Next Story