A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice Anu Malhotra also asked them about the rules followed by western countries on this issue.
"What is the rule in western countries. What practice they adopt in case people feed stray dogs?," the bench said adding that it also wanted to know what practice authorities adopt here in dealing with stray dogs and monkeys.
"There are monkeys all over Delhi, troubling people. What practice and rules you follow regarding them. Monkeys are not sterilised. Are they? They need to be kept properly.
The court was hearing an appeal filed by a resident of Malviya Nagar seeking directions to the Delhi government and the municipal corporations to shift stray dogs from the parking area of his society to some other place.
While the hearing was going on, several other lawyers also shared the experience of their encounters with stray canines and one of them told the bench that he was bitten by a dog in the high court premises.
The lawyer said that despite informing the registrar general of the high court about the incident, there has been no change in the scenario inside the court complex.
The bench also questioned the civic bodies as to why they leave dogs at the same place after sterilisation.
To this, the counsel for the authorities said that as per the rule book, the provision is to sterilise stray canines and leave them to the place from where they were picked up.
The court, however, asked the authorities to place the rule book before it by July 12.
Petitioner Om Prakash Saini, a resident of Khirki Extension, has come to the court challenging the order of a single judge who refused to entertain his prayer for shifting of stray dogs.
He said stray dogs keep roaming around, creating "terror and biting people" on many occasions.
The petitioner said that the building and common area was filled with dog excreta and children were unable to study because of the noise of their barking.
One person from the area was hospitalised for a week at AIIMS in November 2015 after being bitten by a dog, the plea added.
He said the single judge had not entertained the petition as a Supreme Court judgement was being inferred by the corporations in a manner that they cannot shift or eliminate stray animals as they are bound by the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
