The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) today told the Bombay High Court that it would not oppose the discharge granted to IPS officer Rajkumar Pandian, a former accused in the Sohrabuddin Shaikh "fake" encounter case, by the trial court.
Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Anil Singh, representing the central probe agency, said this while responding to the court's question as to whether the CBI wanted to present its arguments regarding Pandian's discharge.
Rubabuddin Shaikh, Sohrabuddin's brother, has challenged before the court the discharge granted to Pandian, a Rajasthan police officer, and fellow IPS officers D G Vanzara and Dinesh M N of the Gujarat police.
The CBI chargesheet had named these three, along with 35 others, as accused in the case related to the alleged fake police encounters of Sohrabuddin, his wife Kausar Bi and aide Tulsiram Prajapati.
Between August 2016 and September 2017, the trial court in Mumbai discharged 15 of the 38 accused. Those discharged included senior police officials and also BJP chief Amit Shah, a former Minister of State (Home) in Gujarat.
The CBI has only challenged the discharge of N K Amin of the Gujarat police and constable Dalpat Singh Rathod of the Rajasthan police before the court.
Yesterday, Rubabuddin Shaikh's lawyer Gautam Tiwari and Pandian's lawyer Mahesh Jethmalani concluded their arguments before Justice A M Badar.
The judge then asked the CBI to make its stand clear on Pandian's discharge and subsequently, also on the discharge of Vanzara and Dinesh M N.
The ASG today said that as the CBI had not challenged Pandian's discharge, it did not wish to make any arguments in his case.
"We do not have any comments since we are concerned only with the two revision applications we have filed in the case of Amin and Rathod," he said.
The bench is now hearing the arguments of the lawyer of Dinesh M N, Raja Thakare.
The CBI had claimed that Dinesh was present when Sohrabuddin, his wife and Prajapati were allegedly abducted by the police from Hyderabad. It had also alleged that Dinesh had planned Prajapati's encounter and it was he who had selected a team of trusted officials to accompany Prajapati from a prison in Udaipur to Ahmedabad for a case hearing.
According to the CBI, Prajapati was killed in a fake encounter during the return journey to Udaipur.
Thakare denied the charges against his client and contended that Dinesh was only performing his duty in arranging an escort team for Prajapati.
Sohrabuddin Shaikh, a gangster with alleged terror links, and his wife were killed in an alleged fake encounter by the Gujarat police in November, 2005.
Prajapati, who was said to have witnessed the killings, was gunned down in another alleged staged encounter by the Gujarat and Rajasthan police in December, 2006.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
