However, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis turned down the demand for Mehta's ouster.
Fadnavis recently ordered a probe against Mehta for allegedly allowing unauthorised transfer of extra building rights in the slum rehabilitation authority (SRA) project in south Mumbai, originally granted to slum dwellers, to project affected people (PAPs), apparently to favour a developer.
While sanctioning the changes, Mehta had wrongly mentioned in the project file that he had kept the chief minister in the loop, which was denied by Fadnavis.
"The same builder was given the same plot in 2006 also, but he did nothing to develop the plot for the next 10 years (upto 2016). The state government in 2016 took the plot back, but again the plot was given to the builder this year. This is highly unethical and unacceptable. A plot at such crucial location can not be handed over without the consent of the minister concerned," he said.
Meanwhile, Fadnavis said, "I have already said that I am ready to set up an inquiry into alleged transfer of (extra building) rights by Mehta. A decision cannot be taken immediately as scrutiny has to be done first".
However, Opposition MLAs argued that Mehta should be removed as minister first as his presence in the House could influence the inquiry against him, and walked out of the House in protest.
Meanwhile, speaking to reporters outside the Assembly, Mehta said, "I will answer every question (regarding the issue) in the Assembly only. I won't make any comment outside the House. I have not issued any press statement about the allegations levelled against me".
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
