UK refuses Litvinenko death public inquiry: coroner

Image
AFP London
Last Updated : Jul 12 2013 | 5:35 PM IST
The British government has refused to hold a public inquiry into the poisoning of Russian dissident Alexander Litvinenko, a coroner said today, leaving the current proceedings on the verge of collapse.
Coroner Robert Owen had sought a full public inquiry to replace his lower-level inquest into the 2006 murder of the former spy in London as he is not authorised to investigate the possible involvement of the Russian state.
But he told a hearing at London's Royal Courts of Justice today that the British government had only around one hour earlier denied his request for a judge-led inquiry into the killing.
Litvinenko, 43, was poisoned with radioactive polonium-210 while drinking tea at a London hotel.
His widow Marina has claimed that her husband, a former KGB agent, was working for Britain's foreign intelligence agency MI6 at the time of his slow and agonising death, and that he was killed on the orders of the Kremlin.
Her lawyer Ben Emmerson told today's hearing that the British government had shown an "utter lack of professionalism" in the way it handled the request for a public inquiry.
"The repeated catalogue of broken promises is a sign of something gone awry," Emmerson told the court.
The current inquest into Litvinenko's death was thrown into doubt in May when Owen ruled that he could not hear evidence concerning Russia's alleged role, following an application by the British foreign ministry to keep it secret.
Owen had said he would be failing in his duty "to undertake a full, fair and fearless inquiry into the circumstances of Litvinenko's death" if he was forced to disregard the evidence for national security reasons.
He suggested that the death could instead be considered in a public inquiry in which the evidence alleging Russian state involvement "could be taken into account".
Under English law, evidence cannot be heard in secret as part of an inquest, but could be presented behind closed doors as part of a public inquiry.
Inquests, which are held to examine sudden or unexplained deaths, set out to determine the place and time of death as well as how the deceased came by their death, but they do not apportion blame.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 12 2013 | 5:35 PM IST

Next Story