Uniform code: Law panel may recommend piece meal amendments to

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 05 2017 | 7:25 PM IST
The Law Commission will recommend religion-wise "piece meal" amendments to family laws if it finds it difficult to come out with a composite uniform civil code, Law Commission chairman Justice B S Chauhan said today.
He also said that the civil code cannot be violative of any provision of the Constitution.
The commission is in the process of segregating the nearly 45,000 suggestions its has received on its questionnaire on the uniform civil code.
"The commission will start examining the issue from January... If a composite code is difficult, we will suggest religion-wide amendments to the various family laws in a piece meal manner," Chauhan told PTI here today.
He, however, made it clear that the law panel has so far not taken any decision. "We have to first examine the issue," he pointed out.
He said whatever the panel suggests to the government will be within the framework of the Constitution. "No fundamental right of any person following any religion will be violated," the former Supreme Court judge said.
While examining the issue of a single code, the panel will have to keep in mind issues such as the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution.
"There are provisions in the Constitution which extend certain exemptions to the Northeast," he pointed out.
Amid a raging debate on uniform civil code, the law panel had in October last year sought public views on the subject to revise and reform family laws, saying the aim is to address social injustice rather than to do away with the plurality of laws.
In an appeal issued then, the commission had said the objective behind the endeavour is to address discrimination against vulnerable groups and harmonise various cultural practices even as it assured the people that the "norms of no one class, group or community will dominate the tone and tenor of family law reforms".
In an accompanying questionnaire, the commission had asked whether the existing personal laws and customary practices need codification and whether these would benefit people.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 05 2017 | 7:25 PM IST

Next Story