"The entire supplementary provision (Rs 5,359 crore) proved unnecessary as the actual expenditure (Rs 64,097 crore) incurred was less than the original budget provision (Rs 1,01,323 crore) and savings for the current year stood at Rs 42,584 crore (40 per cent). Out of the savings, Rs 24,622 crore were surrendered on March 31, 2015," the CAG said.
Several policy initiatives taken up by the government were either unfulfilled or were partially executed, primarily due to non-approval of scheme guidelines, non-commencement of works for want of administrative sanction and poor project implementation, apart from non-release of funds, it said.
"Lumpsome provisions (Rs 2,555 crore) without specific details of expenditure were included in the budget for 2014-15. The entire provision was surrendered at the end of the year," the CAG said.
There were several instances of budgetary misclassifications on subsidies, subvention from Central Road Fund etc, which indicated deficiencies in budget formulation, it said.
"Unrealistic budgetary allocations resulting in substantial savings, unnecessary supplementary grants, expenditure incurred without provision and excess re-appropriations, resulting in excess provision are indication of poor budget management," it said.
Telangana came into existence on June 2, 2014 and the CAG report is prepared on the Finance and Appropriation Accounts for ten months.
Although the state government accorded fiscal priority
to development expenditure during 2014-15, it did not ensure that the allocated funds were released fully for the intended purposes.
"State outlay on education (11.57 per cent) in particular, was less than that of the General Category states (16.23 per cent). Further, the share of social sector expenditure to aggregate expenditure (34.42 per cent) was also lower in the state, compared to the General Category States (36.50 per cent).
The CAG has pointed out inaccuracies in Financial Reporting.
There were delays in submission of annual accounts by several autonomous bodies or authorities, which dilute accountability, it said.
"Utilisation Certificates were furnished without actual utilisation or not furnished at all for large amounts both by the state and the implementing agencies for the funds drawn for execution of schemes. Detailed Contingent bills were not submitted in violation of prescribed rules and regulations which is indicative of lack of internal controls," it said.
The CAG said it noticed that there was "non-reconciliation
of 68 per cent (Rs 41,097 crore) of total expenditure and 69 per cent (Rs 35,346 crore) of total receipts" during the year indicating disregard for codal provisions and financial rules by the Controlling Officers.
This would lead to the risk of non-detection of leakages in revenue and irregularities in expenditure, it said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
