"President (Barack) Obama has made clear that should diplomacy fail, force might be necessary to deter and degrade Assad's capacity to deliver these weapons.
"It won't get rid of them, but it could change his willingness to use them," Kerry told reporters yesterday, in Geneva at a joint press availability with his Russian counterpart, Sergei Lavrov, where the two delegation are holding talks on bringing the Syrian chemical weapons under international control.
"The best thing to do, we agree, is remove them altogether. Our challenge here in Geneva is to test the viability of placing Assad's chemical weapons under international control, removing them from Syria, and destroying them forever," Kerry said.
"But the United States has also made clear that the deaths of more than 100,000 Syrians and the displacement of millions either internally or as refugees remains a stain on the world's conscience. We all need to keep that in mind and deal with it," the US Secretary of State said.
Lavrov said that the resolution of the Syrian crisis through diplomatic means would make military strike unnecessary.
"We proceed from the fact that the solution on this problem will make unnecessary any strike on the Syrian Arab Republic, and I am convinced that our American colleagues, as President Obama stated, are firmly convinced that we should follow the peaceful way of resolution of the conflict in Syria," he said.
In Washington, the White House spokesperson, Jay Carney, reiterated that the military action is not off the table.
"The basic position, as the (US) President described in his address to the nation (on Tuesday), is that the military remains in a position to execute a plan around holding Assad accountable for his appalling use of chemical weapons against civilians.
And that remains true today," he said in response to a question at his daily news conference.
"We are obviously focused on pursuing this diplomatic option. I think that is the right thing to do. It is certainly the responsible thing to explore this avenue and to see if it is possible to resolve this peacefully, or diplomatically," he said.
The negotiations going on in Geneva with regard to Syrian chemical weapons, he said, would take time.
"I will simply say from here that this understandably will take some time," he said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)