The woman, a Delhi resident, narrated her tale of woes in a petition before Justice S P Garg, alleging that the 42-year old "influential" police officer had threatened that not only her but her son would also be harmed if she complained.
She approached the high court after the trial court refused to entertain her plea seeking registration of an FIR against the official for allegedly committing offences like causing grievous hurt, attempting to murder, wrongful restraint and confinement, outraging her modesty and even exploiting her physically.
The plea states that as a divorcee, the woman had gone to the Moti Nagar police station here on February 24, 2012, to lodge a complaint against a man with whom she had developed live-in relationship after separation from her husband who used to beat her up.
With the police refusing to register a First Information Report (FIR) on "flimsy" grounds, she visited the police station regularly where she met the then Station House Officer (SHO) who also allegedly kept dilly-dallying, her plea said.
The petition further alleged that on the plea that she needed counselling, the officer invited her to a five-star hotel on March 3, 2012, and then started visiting her house regularly. After several such 'counseling sessions', the police officer proposed marriage on March 4, 2014.
While she rejected the proposal, the SHO continued to persist, the plea alleged and said she finally succumbed to his pressure and married the cop on June 7, 2012 at a small function. The cop also adopted the woman's son and recorded himself as the boy's father at a school.
When confronted with his earlier marriage and sons, the cop abused her and warned her of physical harm. Last year, when she warned him that she would complain to higher police authorities, the cop "barged into my house, beat me up, warned that I and my children would be killed if I ever complained to his superiors, and began pressurising me for a one-time settlement," the petition said.
On September 9, 2014, she filed a complaint with the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Tis Hazari courts, which dismissed it in November. She filed a revision petition against this order which was also dismissed.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
