AIMPLB told the apex court that personal laws can't be "re-written" in the name of social reforms and "courts cannot supplant its own interpretations over the text of scriptures".
Noorjehan Safia Niaz, co-founder of Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA), which is one of the petitioners, said, "No one can stop the citizen of this country to approach the court. That is a right Muslim women also have."
"... AIMPLB has been completely obstinate and rigid and there is no point talking to bodies like these. So, SC will be approached and it will have the right to interpret."
She also claimed that the practice of triple talaq is un-Quranic as the religious text insists on mandatory arbitration for seeking divorce.
CPI-M leader Brinda Karat said, "AIMPLB has refused to listen to the many pleas of women on the complete unfairness of arbitrary triple talaq."
Renowned women's right activist Kamla Bhasin said it is AIMPLB which is being un-Quranic.
"Through Quran, Prophet Mohammad challenged all the existing religions and tradition to move towards equality and justice and that was the main goal of his life."
"... He also said that after me if there is injustice, wise people of that time can take a decision. He gave people the right to re-interpret."
She added, "Our most important religious, oral, ethical book is our Constitution. If any religion goes against that it needs to be challenged and changed.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
