ROME (Reuters) - India has until next Tuesday to support a global trade deal struck last year or risk being left out of the agreement to ease worldwide customs rules, the chairman of EU trade ministers said on Wednesday.
India in July blocked what would have been the first global trade reform in two decades, which according to some estimates would add $1 trillion and 21 million jobs to the world economy.
"India is not following up what we have all decided in Bali. So we still want to give more time to change its mind," Italy's deputy industry minister Carlo Calenda, who is responsible for trade, told Reuters in an interview.
Calenda was speaking at the end of a meeting of EU trade ministers in Rome, which he was chairing as Italy currently holds the six-month rotating presidency of the European Union.
Calenda said India was being given until the meeting of the World Trade Organisation's general council on Oct. 21 to back the customs deal. Failure to do so would mean one of two things.
"One is to start again with multilateral discussions but not many countries are willing to do that, the other is to say let's consider this binding for those that have the willingness to go ahead," Calenda said, making clear that the latter was far more likely to occur.
Last December's agreement was a milestone for the WTO, marking the 160-member organisation's first global trade agreement since it was created in 1995.
It also rekindled confidence in its ability to lower barriers to trade worldwide, after 12 years of fruitless negotiations in the Doha round.
India had insisted that, in exchange for signing the "trade facilitation" agreement, it must see more progress on a parallel pact giving it more freedom to subsidise and stockpile food grains. It got support from Cuba, Venezuela and Bolivia.
India's new nationalist government has insisted that a permanent agreement on its subsidised food stockpiling must be in place at the same time as the trade facilitation deal, well ahead of a 2017 target set last December in Bali.
"There is a scenario where the multilateral becomes pluri-lateral and that is not going to be a positive thing," Calenda said.
That could mean countries including the United States, those of the European Union, Australia, Japan and Norway pushing ahead with a deal among the willing.
Trade experts have said that the failure is likely to end the era of trying to cobble together global trade agreements and to accelerate efforts by smaller groups of like-minded nations to liberalise trade among themselves. India has been vocal in opposing such moves, making its veto even more surprising.
(Reporting by Philip Blenkinsop; Editing by Sonya Hepinstall)
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
