India notifies WTO of $56 billion farm support in 2010-11

Image
Reuters GENEVA
Last Updated : Sep 10 2014 | 11:27 PM IST

By Tom Miles

GENEVA (Reuters) - India spent $56.1 billion on support for farmers in 2010-2011, it said in a World Trade Organization filing on Wednesday, a document that will be pored over for evidence that it breached agreed limits on agricultural subsidies.

The United States and other WTO members have strongly criticised India for being almost a decade behind with notifications on farm support and for vetoing a landmark WTO agreement because it wanted more attention paid to its demand to be able to stockpile subsidised crops to ensure food security.

The notification will enable India to argue that it is meeting its obligations, reinforcing its call for more freedom to subsidise farmers to help feed the poor.

India's filing, covering the seven years from 2004-2005 to 2010-2011, detailed subsidies that are permitted by the WTO as well as other measures that it said were exempt from the global trade body's rules.

The 27-page document showed subsidies for poor farmers - such as for fertilisers, irrigation, electricity and seeds - almost tripled over the period, from $10.3 billion to $29.1 billion. It also showed a large rise in the bill for state food stockpiles for food security purposes, which rose from $5.7 billion to $13.8 billion.

A third large component was the provision of cheap loans to farmers and debt waivers, which began in 2006-2007 and was worth $3.3 billion in 2010-2011.

The filing also showed the prices the government paid farmers for crops such as rice, wheat and cotton in each year, and said the level of price subsidy was within the allowed limit of 10 percent of the market value of total production, without giving that data in full.

It suggested that rather than paying farmers too much for their crop, it had in fact paid them too little - wheat received a negative price subsidy throughout the seven years, as did rice and cotton in the first few years covered.

That implies that even in the commodity boom years, India was offering its wheat farmers less than the WTO reference price, which is based on international prices in 1986-1988.

(Reporting by Tom Miles; editing by Susan Thomas and Pravin Char)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 10 2014 | 11:18 PM IST

Next Story