P&G's Gillette sues Schick maker Edgewell over razor blade design

Image
Reuters
Last Updated : Sep 26 2017 | 3:42 AM IST

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) - Procter & Gamble Co's Gillette unit on Monday sued the maker of Schick razors for the second time in 13 months, seeking to stop its sale of razor blade cartridges designed to fit Gillette's Fusion handles.

Gillette filed its latest lawsuit against Edgewell Personal Care Co roughly six months after slashing razor prices an average of 12 percent to keep rivals such as Schick, Harry's and Dollar Shave Club from cutting into its still-dominant market share for men's razors and blades.

In a complaint filed in the federal court in New Haven, Connecticut, Gillette said Schick willfully infringed its 2015 patent for a removable shaving cartridge assembly by designing Hydro Connect 5 and Hydro Connect 5 Sensitive cartridges to fit Fusion razor handles.

Gillette said this has caused "irreparable harm" and justifies that Edgewell pay royalties and triple damages.

P&G said it also filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission seeking to block Edgewell from importing infringing products from China.

Edgewell declined to comment, saying it was still evaluating the complaint, which was filed in the early afternoon.

The case was brought four months after Edgewell launched an online subscription service to sell Hydro Connect 5 cartridges that could fit Fusion handles, and Hydro Connect 3 cartridges that could fit Gillette's Mach3 handles.

Gillette separately sued Edgewell in August 2016, claiming it falsely marketed a line of private label three-blade razors and cartridges as being "as good or better than Mach3."

The companies settled later that year, and the lawsuit was dismissed, according to court records.

Edgewell was spun off in July 2015 by battery maker Energizer Holdings Inc and is based in Chesterfield, Missouri, though it has offices in Connecticut. Gillette is based in Boston, and P&G in Cincinnati.

The case is Gillette Co v Edgewell Personal Care Co, U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut, No. 17-01594.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Steve Orlofsky and Jonathan Oatis)

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 26 2017 | 3:23 AM IST

Next Story