Her statement has come even as a final decision on the matter of raising the height of the dam is in the offing as the proposal is now before the Narmada Control Authority headed by the Secretary water resources Ministry.
The increase in height has already been cleared by a Resettlement and Rehabilitation Sub Group of the Narmada Control Authority on June 26 on the basis of the reports by Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat and Maharashtra, confirming, that ‘rehabilitation is complete’. The NCA meeting is expected any day , water resources ministry sources said.
While states have claimed completion of rehabilitation process, the Narmada Bachao Andolan has said that 40,000 families are living in 245 villages in the submergence area spread across three states. The maximum are in Madhya Pradesh in 191 villages. They have not been given alternative land, Patkar said.
The maximum permissible height for the project. is 138.68 meters.
Earlier the maximum height permitted was 166 meters but this was reduced following strong opposition from activists led by Patkar.
Sanjay Parikh lawyer in the Supreme Court said that the apex court both the cases of Sardar Sarovar and Tehri dam had ruled that R and R should be completed before height of the dam can be increased.
The Narmada dam construction is complete except for erection of gates. Once the height is increased and the gates erected the people living in the submergible areas would be impacted, says Parikh. So long as the gates are not there, the submergible areas are safe, he points out.
He said that the state may claim to have completed R and R on the basis of monetary payments made to many of the evacuees, but it is not complete as per the award which promises land for land. He said that the Government was also bound to consider claims of adult members of the family as per the court ruling in Omkareshwar cares.
Besides the State had to provide village like units with all facilities before the people were evacuated. Since none of this has been done, R and R cannot be termed complete, Parikh said. Asked about Patkar's fears of a Uttarkhand type situation, Parikh said that in rainy season, any obstruction to the river is bound to lead to catastrophe if people are not moved to safety.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)