Statsguru: Making sense of GDP data

Mining was expected to contract by 1.8% in FY17, but ended up growing by 1.8%

graph
(Click on the image to enlarge)
Ishan Bakshi
Last Updated : Jun 05 2017 | 1:10 AM IST
Robust data form the bedrock of policy making. But when the data itself are misleading, how should policymakers respond? 

Take the gross domestic product (GDP) estimates. Since January, the Central Statistics Office (CSO) has released three estimates of FY17 GDP, consistently pegging headline growth at 7.1 per cent across all three forecasts as shown in Chart 1. But GVA has been marked down from 7 per cent in the first advance estimates to 6.6 per cent in the latest provisional estimates, as shown in Chart 2. And despite concerns, the investment rate for FY17 has been marginally revised upward, as shown in Chart 3. Presumably this is because of a downward revision in FY16 estimates.

Look deeper and the revisions in estimates are bewildering.  

Mining was expected to contract by 1.8 per cent in FY17, but ended up growing by 1.8 per cent, as shown in Chart 4. Similarly, construction was projected to grow at 3.1 per cent according to the second estimates, but after the preliminary data for demonetisation were factored in, it was scaled down to 1.7 per cent later. Such sharp revisions are also seen in the quarterly estimates. As Chart 5 shows, Q1FY17 growth was revised downward to 6.9 per cent in the second estimates from 7.3 per cent earlier, only to be revised upwards to 7.6 per cent in the provisional estimates. 

Similarly, an investment contraction in the first half of FY17 has now turned into an expansion, with investments actually contracting in Q4FY17 as seen in Chart 6. So, how should monetary policy have responded? GVA excluding farm and government sector was expected to grow by 6 per cent in Q4. But as Chart 7 shows, it grew only by 3.8 per cent. While GVA by farm and government sector have been revised upward as seen in Chart 8, this too might be revised, as the MOSPI has clarified to Business Standard that only the data for April to February have been factored in for estimating the government spending.

(Click on the image to enlarge)

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story