Statsguru: Why is the cheetah reintroduction in India a challenge?

Attempts at sustainable fishing practices which incorporate fisherman's wishes are said to be one way to address the issue

cheetah
Conservation can be challenging at a time when 14.5 million people are said to be dependent on fishing for their livelihood
Sachin P Mampatta
2 min read Last Updated : Sep 26 2022 | 12:41 AM IST
The Union government’s decision to bring back cheetahs to India has put wildlife conservation in focus.

India has over 100,000 species of fauna, a mark of above average biodiversity relative to the land it occupies. It has 2.4 per cent of the earth’s land area but between 7-8 per cent of all global species (chart 1).

The import of eight cheetahs from Namibia comes on the back of an increasing number of other big cats. The tiger population has been going up, according to estimates over the years, as is the population of lions. India had nearly 700 lions and 3,000 tigers at the last count. The numbers have improved significantly over the years (charts 2,3). The cheetah however, died out in India about 70 years ago, and questions have been raised whether such translocations can be successful. 

Another mammal species that India has managed to successfully hold on to is the elephant. The elephant population has stabilised at around the 30,000 mark going by the last available government figures (chart 4).

There are 94 mammals which fall in the list of threatened species in India. The number is larger for invertebrates with 135 threatened species. The most affected appear to be fish with 228 species finding their way to the threatened list (chart 5).

Conservation can be challenging at a time when 14.5 million people are said to be dependent on fishing for their livelihood. Attempts at sustainable fishing practices which incorporate fisherman’s wishes are said to be one way to address the issue.

The thrust for such efforts may increasingly come from the Centre. Central spending has accounted for an increasing share of domestic biodiversity expenditure (chart 6). Meanwhile, the share of threatened species has come down from 13.8 per cent in 2014 when 4,681 species were evaluated to 12.25 per cent when 5,507 species were evaluated in 2018.
 












StatsGuru is a weekly feature. Every Monday, Business Standard guides you through the numbers you need to know to make sense of the headlines

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :StatsGuruwildlifeAnimalsextinct species

Next Story