Tax shadow over software MNCs

Image
BS Reporters New Delhi/Mumbai
Last Updated : Feb 05 2013 | 3:55 AM IST
Microsoft studying Rs 700 cr royalty order.
 
Multinational software firms like Microsoft, SAP and Oracle -- which license software and earn royalty on it from Indian customers "� are facing the heat from assessing officers if they have not paid taxes on the gross royalty income.
 
According to a ruling by New Delhi-based Commissioner Income Tax (Appeal), Microsoft has to cough up over Rs 700 crore in taxes and interest for the period 1999 to 2005.
 
The case pertains to Gracemac Corporation, a subsidiary of Microsoft. The CIT (A) ruled that the company was liable to pay income-tax on its gross royalty income from licensing of software to Indian customers.
 
The gross royalty income for the six assessment years is computed to be about Rs 2,240 crore. "The product is licensed, not sold" are the key words. Hence, it is treated as royalty and there's a 15 per cent tax on royalty. However, in response to a notice, Microsoft had filed returns of income for all these years, declaring nil income.
 
"Microsoft believes it is in full compliance with the Indian tax laws and income-tax treaty agreement between India and the US. This is an appellate order. Microsoft is reviewing the order and we will determine our course of action accordingly," said a Microsoft spokesperson.
 
This issue is being debated for the last 15 years, say Chartered Accountants (CAs), income-tax experts and analysts. They view this as an attempt to add newer revenue streams.
 
Opinions on the subject differ. "A copy of software supplied by the Microsoft does not amount to a sale. It is a licence to use the software as stipulated in the software licence agreement. This is because software is an intellectual property right (IPR) which can be licensed to one user and can be given further to any number of users. In other words, the IPR in software still remains intact with the supplier. Thus the income from software licence is in the nature of royalty according to domestic law and DTAA and is taxable in India," notes a tax expert.
 
However, K R Girish, partner BSR & Co, says: "Microsoft solutions will fall under the shrink-wrap software category. It is quite clear that the Right to use Copyright is liable for royalty but Right to use Copyrighted product does not demand royalty. And that is the case of Microsoft. I think the company, if it decides to go for a higher appeal, has a good case."

 
 

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 03 2008 | 12:00 AM IST

Next Story