Telecom firms' claim for subsidy questioned

Image
Press Trust Of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 05 2013 | 1:51 AM IST
Private telecom firms Reliance Communication and Tata Teleservices have been found making "false" claims and drawing excess subsidy from the Universal Service Obligation (USO) Fund for providing services in rural areas.
 
Inspections in various circles revealed they claimed urban lines falling within municipal limits as rural lines. No subsidy is given for urban lines.
 
"The proportion of wrong claims by universal service providers (USPs) in certain areas was found to be 48-70 per cent of the rural lines claimed. Action to disallow subsidy was taken in accordance with the terms of the agreement," Shantanu Consul, the administrator of USO Fund, said in a note to the department of telecom (DoT).
 
In a particular case, Reliance claimed a subsidy of around Rs 7.63 crore for 12,469 lines installed in four districts of Kerala, the administrator's note said. "On verification, it was found that a large number of these lines were working in urban areas," it said.
 
The operator submitted a revised claim of about Rs 2.26 crore pertaining to 3,694 lines, the note pointed out.
 
Tata Teleservices has also been found making "false" claims. One of the example was in Bharthana village in Uttar Pradesh (East) for the quarter ended December, 2006, where it claimed to have installed 647 rural lines. During verification, it was found that all these lines were in urban areas.
 
According to the administrator's note, an inspection conducted by the deputy administrator (USO Fund) found that what was being claimed as a village (Bharthana) was actually a tehsil/sub-district headquarters, an urban area since 1974.
 
In the revised claim submitted to the USO office according to a decision taken in a meeting with the administrator, the number of rural lines was reduced to 338. "Even now, doubts exist regarding the true nature of the rural lines," the note said.
 
The USO Fund was created by the government to offer subsidy to operators to encourage them to offer services in rural areas. Total subsidy payable under the scheme works out to around Rs 2,186 crore and the players claim to have installed 3,657 towers covering about 200,000 villages.
 
According to the USO Fund administrator, despite the tricky monitoring issues, the scheme has been successful in bringing about various positive results such as introduction of competition in rural telephony and familiarity with the rural telecom market, a hitherto unknown territory for private players.

 

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 29 2007 | 12:00 AM IST

Next Story