Stalled projects down to 7% of GDP

Govt to try various models to revive investment

Image
BS Reporter New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 28 2015 | 12:59 AM IST
The Economic Survey for 2014-15, released on Friday, showed there had been a gradual decline in the rate of stalled projects since last year.

Stalled projects, a key reason for a slide in gross fixed capital formation in the past few years, totalled Rs 8.8 lakh crore (7 per cent of gross domestic product) at the end of December 2014. But, the stalled projects were down to 7 per cent of GDP, compared with 8.3 per cent a year ago.

Of the total stalled projects, Rs 7 lakh crore worth of projects were in the private sector, and the rest in the public sector. Though the numbers might seem large, clearing only 100 of the projects will address 83 per cent of stalled projects by value, the survey notes.

Data clearly distinguish the reasons for stalling of private- and public-sector projects. While the stalled ones in the private sector are due to unfavorable market conditions, regulatory hurdles are the cause for a majority of public-sector stalled projects.

But with stalled projects severely affecting the balance sheets of companies, as well as public-sector banks, it has impaired their ability to launch fresh investments. So, the Survey notes that the burden of kick-starting the investment cycle in the short run lies on the public sector even though the private sector remains key to the rapid delivery of high-quality infrastructure, .

Thus, the Survey advocates the need to restructure the PPP framework to revive interest in infrastructure and bring pension and insurance funds on board. One proposal the survey moots is setting up a high-powered independent renegotiation committee, in line with suggestion from which many in industry.

Though some experts have suggested a new model to kick-start the investment cycle, where the public sector builds assets and transfers it to the private sector for maintenance and operation, the Survey suggests this might not be the best option, as separating construction and maintenance will provide an incentive to raise profits by cutting corners during construction. For example, in highway projects, maintenance costs depend significantly on construction quality.

The Survey suggests a more practical approach will be to experiment with different models. For one, bids for port projects could be on an annual fee basis, with full tariff flexibility. Another, for electricity generation, bids could be in two parts, with a variable charge based on normative efficiency or determined by regulators, and a capacity charge.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 28 2015 | 12:40 AM IST

Next Story