Apex court verdict on pre-import conditions gives relief to exporters

Any claim for refund/credit shall be examined on its merits and on a case-by-case basis: SC

Supreme Court (Photo: Wikipedia)
Supreme Court (Photo: Wikipedia)
Indivjal Dhasmana New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : May 10 2023 | 11:54 AM IST
The Supreme Court's recent judgment to uphold the constitutional validity of pre-import condition for availing of advance authorisation scheme to take integrated goods and services tax (IGST) credits was interpreted to have left exporters in lunch. It, however, gives relief to exporters.

The Supreme Court allowed the respondents to claim refund or input credit. For doing so, the respondents have to approach the jurisdictional commissioner and apply with documentary evidence within six weeks from the date of the judgment, it said.

The order said a claim for refund/credit shall be examined on its merits, on a case-by-case basis.

It directed the revenue department to come out with the appropriate procedure to be followed through a circular in this regard.

However, the issue may arise if it is interpreted that the order is confined to respondents only and not to every exporter.

Abhishek Rastogi, founder of law firm Rastogi Chambers who argued the case in the Supreme Court, said exporters other than respondents will have to argue the case in lower courts on the basis of the apex court order.

Alternatively, they can approach jurisdictional commissioners who may decide the matter on the basis of the Supreme Court verdict's persuasive value for other exporters too, he said.  

The Supreme Court late last month set aside a Gujarat High Court judgment which had declared as ultra vires pre-import conditions for claiming refunds or credit for IGST or compensation cess under advance authorisation licence.

The pre-import conditions, which basically say that exporters will have to import goods before exports to claim refunds or credits under advance authorisation license, were made effective from October 13, 2017 but were later withdrawn from January 10, 2019. However, the withdrawal was made prospective. This meant that those who did not meet the conditions of pre-import between October 13, 2107 and January 9, 2019, were not able to take the benefits of refunds of IGST or compensation cess. 
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Supreme CourtexportersGSTimporteconomyIGST

First Published: May 10 2023 | 11:54 AM IST

Next Story