The Supreme Court today asked the Governor of Goa to hold a floor test in the state assembly on Thursday to determine the majority but refused the request of the Congress party to hold back the swearing in of the new government headed by BJP leader Manohar Parrikar. At a special sitting of the court during the Holi recess, the bench presided over by Chief Justice J S Khehar specified that the only agenda for the session will be the floor test. AlL formalities for the test shall be completed by Wednesday, including those which have to be done by the Election Commission.
The three-judge bench heard Congress counsel A M Singhvi who raised several constitutional issues for nearly two hours but in the end the court stated that all these can be disposed of with a "simple order" to hold the floor test as early as possible.
Singhvi argued that the governor had violated constitutional norms by not calling the single largest party winning the elections, which is the Congress. He cited several judgments emphasising that it was the governor's duty to at least contact the party with the largest number of legislators. In this case, Congress had 17 in the 40-member house and BJP had only 13. The governor showed extreme hurry on the night when the election results were announced and named Parrikkar as the chief minister. Congress was not even contacted on phone, thereby denying it an opportunity to show its strength. This was against the mandate of the people. The governor played a "cat and mouse game" by hurrying to call the second larges party, counsel said. He added that it was subversion of democracy, which is one of the basic structures of the Constitution.
Harish Salve, senior counsel for BJP, argued that the governor was convinced that Parikkar had the support of three Maharashtrawadi Gomantak Party legislators and three from Goa Forward Party. In addition there were two independents who supported BJP. Therefore BJP had 21 legislators which formed the majority in the house. The governor had announced floor test within 15 days.
The judges observed that Congress should have "run" to the Governor immediately after the results were declared. It has not made Parikkar a party in the petition. "You cannot have an order behind his back," the judges said. They also remarked that the Congress party has not based its pleadings with hard evidence on the number of legislators supporting it. Regarding the judgments cited by Singhvi, the court said they were not necessary. "You are fuzzy about commas and full stops," the Chief Justice observed.
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)