Copyright owner can issue licences even if not a registered society: HC

The court held that PPL, being the owner of the copyright in the songs, was entitled to issue licenses for their use, even though the latter was not a registered copyright society

Delhi High Court
Delhi High Court (Photo: Twitter)
Bhavini Mishra Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Mar 04 2025 | 8:53 PM IST

Don't want to miss the best from Business Standard?

The Delhi High Court on Monday restrained Azure Hospitality Private Limited (owner of popular restaurants such as Mamagoto, Dhaba, Sly Granny, Fox Trot, etc.) from playing Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL) songs on the premises of their restaurants without an appropriate licence.
 
The court held that PPL, being the owner of the copyright in the songs, was entitled to issue licences for their use, even though it was not a registered copyright society.
 
"The role of a copyright society, as envisaged under the provisions of the Copyright Act, is only for the purposes of collection of fees/royalties as an agent of the copyright owners," the court order stated.
 
The court took into account that the right to grant a licence for its works was an inherent right of a copyright owner under Section 30 of the Copyright Act and that Section 33(1) of the Copyright Act could not override such an inherent right.
 
Section 30 of the Copyright Act, 1957, allows copyright owners to grant licences for their work. Section 33(1) of the Copyright Act, 1957, states that only registered copyright societies can issue licences for works that have copyright.
 
"Section 33 of the Copyright Act comes into play only where owners, who are members of a copyright society, have assigned the right to grant licences to a copyright society," the court said.
 
The court noted that Azure had not denied that they were playing PPL’s songs on their premises and were, therefore, admittedly infringing PPL’s copyright. Azure was restrained from using PPL’s songs until the final disposal of the suit.
 
PPL was represented by senior advocates Rajiv Nayar and Chander M Lall, along with Ankur Sangal, partner at law firm Khaitan & Co, and his team comprising Sucheta Roy, principal associate; Raghu Vinayak Sinha, senior associate; and Shaurya Pandey, associate.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Copyright rulesCopyright ActDelhi High Court

First Published: Mar 04 2025 | 8:53 PM IST

Next Story