Supreme Court junks plea against Xerox India arm for 215-day delay

The CJI said that such a delay by government departments is not in the interest of India's investment climate and that pursuing a case on time is an important part of the ease of doing business

Supreme Court, SC, Top Court
Photo: Shutterstock
Bhavini Mishra New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Jul 10 2024 | 11:42 PM IST

Don't want to miss the best from Business Standard?

The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to entertain an appeal by the income tax department against the Indian arm of Xerox, saying the plea was filed 215 days late.

"How can the Supreme Court condone a 215-day delay by the income tax department? What message will it send to foreign investors, like 'see SC is condoning such huge delays'? Sorry, that cannot be done. These companies are working here and provide revenues, jobs, and courts also give a signal that there has to be some balance, you see. Sorry," said Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud.

The CJI said that such a delay by government departments is not in the interest of India's investment climate and that pursuing a case on time is an important part of the ease of doing business.

Under the Limitation Act, the period of limitation for an appeal to a high court is 90 days from the date of order/decree, and to any other court from an order, 30 days from the date of order/decree.

Last year, the Bombay High Court had observed how governments are the largest litigant. The government is now working on a National Litigation Policy to transform the government into an ‘efficient’ litigant, ensuring that it is well-represented in legal proceedings.

In January 2024, the apex court had expressed shock and surprise over the department filing an appeal four years late. The top court also said in January that in the absence of any particular period of time being prescribed to file an appeal, the same would be governed by the principle of 'reasonable time', for which, by virtue of its very nature, no straitjacket formula can be laid down and it is to be determined as per the facts and circumstances of each case.

The question before the apex court on Wednesday was whether the marketing expense incurred by Xerox would amount to an international transaction and be taxed accordingly.

Agreeing with the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) order, the Delhi High Court ruled in favour of Xerox.

"We allow this ground of assessee's (Xerox) appeal and direct to re-compute the depreciation and allow the necessary relief to the assessee," the HC order said.

Xerox, an American corporation, was the first to manufacture xerographic plain-paper copiers.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :xerox indiaSupreme Court

First Published: Jul 10 2024 | 8:35 PM IST

Next Story