New mutual fund schemes with performance-based fee on the anvil

Proposal being reviewed by a working group formed by Sebi

Sebi
Other than that, Sebi wants to make TER all-inclusive. It wants AMCs to bring expenses like brokerage and goods and services tax (GST) on management fee within TER
Abhishek KumarKhushboo Tiwari Mumbai
4 min read Last Updated : May 03 2023 | 7:56 PM IST
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) is considering a proposal to allow mutual funds (MFs) to charge a fee based on their performance, said Ananta Barua, whole-time member of the markets regulator. He said the proposal is being reviewed by a working group formed to look into cost structures.

“One working group has been set up which is going to review... One of the suggestions is that if any scheme or fund is performing well above the benchmark, it (fee) can be linked to its performance. When the committee finds merit, we can take it through a consultation paper,” said Barua at the CII Mutual Fund Summit.

The proposal for performance-linked schemes is part of a slew of ongoing consultations on rationalising costs and expenses for mutual fund investors.

Though he didn't disclose the contours of the proposed new fee structure, industry players said Sebi may create an optional new category just like direct plans. Under this, the base fee charged would be reduced and additional charges would be based on performance.

Experts are of the opinion that this may even give scope for disincentives like cutting the fee paid to mutual funds in case of constant underperformance versus the benchmark.

“Whatever benefits the industry is gaining because of the efficiencies built into the systems over time should be passed on to customers. From that perspective, we regularly try to rationalise costs. We will soon come out with a very elaborative consultation paper on the cost structure," said Manoj Kumar, executive Director, Sebi, at the event.

At present, mutual funds are only allowed to charge a fixed fee, while other pooled investment products, such as portfolio management services (PMS) and alternative investment funds (AIFs), have performance-linked fee structures.

Under such structures, the asset manager is allowed to levy an additional charge if the fund consistently outperforms a relevant benchmark index and gives higher annualised returns.

The proposal comes at a time when the regulator is planning to overhaul the expense structure of mutual funds. After a board meeting last month, Sebi chief indicated it's looking to introduce new total expense ratio (TER) slabs linked to total equity and debt assets by replacing the current ones that are linked to assets of an individual scheme.

Other than that, Sebi wants to make TER all-inclusive. It wants AMCs to bring expenses like brokerage and goods and services tax (GST) on management fee within TER.

Amongst other measures to streamline operations and functioning in the mutual fund industry, the markets regulator is looking at a relatively comprehensive set of regulations called MF Lite.

Under the discussions for MF Lite, certain requirements on net worth, etc, may be done away with for any entity planning to launch passive-themed funds.

Kumar also hinted at a wider campaign by Amfi to reach out to investors across India, something which was being tried through the incentives provided for B30 cities.

"Sebi is working on building a new improved and inclusive framework of B30 incentives which will be far more superior,"  added Kumar. 

Additionally, the Association of Mutual Funds of India (Amfi) may also be given additional self-regulatory responsibilities to cut down the time required for certain steps and to enhance market monitoring.

Under Process

  • Sebi’s working group to review proposal for performance-linked MF schemes
  • Markets regulator reviewing expenses and cost structures at several levels
  • It is looking at B30 incentives, may launch another campaign for promoting MFs in 
  • smaller cities
  • MF Lite, a truncated set of regulations for passive funds, also in the works
  • Industry players say the proposed cost structure may be introduced through a new optional category, may 
  • give scope for disincentives too
  • Amfi 2.0 may have self-regulatory responsibilities

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :SEBISebi normsIndian Mutual Fund IndustryMutual funds MFsMutual Funds

Next Story