Tesla tightens rules to limit shareholder suits after Musk pay battle

Tesla changed its bylaws to require investors to hold at least 3% of shares to file or maintain a derivative lawsuit, aiming to limit future legal challenges like those over Musk's pay package

Elon Musk, Tesla CEO
Musk shifted Tesla’s incorporation to Texas last year after a judge in Delaware struck down a “moonshot” package of stock options for Musk | Image: Bloomberg
Bloomberg
2 min read Last Updated : May 17 2025 | 9:58 AM IST
By Richard Clough and Madlin Mekelburg
 
Tesla Inc took a step to prevent future shareholder lawsuits like the one that blocked a record-setting pay package for Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk. 
The automaker late Friday disclosed changes to its corporate bylaws that will require investors to own at least 3 per cent of the company’s shares in order to “institute or maintain a derivative proceeding.” The move was taken on May 15, according to a regulatory filing.
 
The change comes days after Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed legislation enacting a series of changes to the state’s corporate law, including allowing companies to adopt ownership thresholds that must be met for shareholder derivative claims. Abbott and other Republican leaders in the state have touted the measure as a method for enticing more businesses to incorporate in the state. 
 
Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
 
Musk shifted Tesla’s incorporation to Texas last year after a judge in Delaware struck down a “moonshot” package of stock options for Musk. 
 
The compensation agreement, approved by shareholders in 2018, was initially worth $2.6 billion and spiked to $56 billion by the time it was voided in early 2024. Plunging and soaring with the company’s fortunes, it has been valued in excess of $100 billion when the shares have climbed.
 
The package was challenged by a shareholder who argued that Tesla’s directors didn’t make proper disclosures about the terms and performance benchmarks required. Delaware Chancery Court Chief Judge Kathaleen St. J. McCormick agreed, finding that Musk had undue influence over the process and that Tesla’s board, which includes longtime friends and associates, was rife with conflicts of interest.
 
Tesla has appealed that decision to the Delaware Supreme Court, a process that could still take months. Shareholders voted last year to re-ratify the prior package, part of a symbolic effort to bolster Musk’s legal case.
 
Tesla disclosed in a regulatory filing last month that the board had established a special committee to consider compensation matters involving the CEO.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Elon MuskElon Musk TeslaTeslaTesla IncShareholders

First Published: May 17 2025 | 9:58 AM IST

Next Story