Wednesday, December 17, 2025 | 03:20 PM ISTहिंदी में पढें
Business Standard
Notification Icon
userprofile IconSearch

Consumer protection: Challenges of prolonged litigation, low compensation

Since no expert evidence was provided, the National Commission held that a "manufacturing defect" had not been established, but the repeated major repairs constituted a "deficiency in service"

gavel law cases
premium

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Jehangir B Gai

Listen to This Article

Bahadur Singh purchased a Mitsubishi Lancer diesel vehicle manufactured by Hindustan Motors. It was purchased for Rs 9,32,829 from Northern Motors Pvt. Ltd., an authorised dealer.
 
Within a few months of purchase, while Singh was driving the vehicle on January 7, 2005, he noticed noise and excessive fuel consumption. He sent the vehicle to the dealer to address these defects, as it was within the warranty period.
 
The dealer attended to the vehicle, but the same defects kept recurring, requiring repeated repairs. On June 21, 2005, the vehicle came to an abrupt halt due to engine seizure. It had to
Disclaimer: These are personal views of the writer. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of www.business-standard.com or the Business Standard newspaper