Giving up power comes in many forms, among them giving a partner more independence, admitting faults, showing respect and being willing to compromise, researchers said.
"It's common for partners to be sensitive to how to share power and control when making decisions in their relationship," said researcher Keith Sanford, an associate professor of psychology and neuroscience in Baylor University's College of Arts & Sciences.
The research results are based on two studies of married or cohabitating people and build upon previous research by Sanford.
Earlier studies of more than 3,500 married people found that there are just two basic types of underlying concerns that couples experience during conflicts: "perceived threat," in which a person thinks that his or her status is threatened by a critical or demanding partner; and "perceived neglect," in which an individual sees a partner as being disloyal or inattentive and showing a lack of investment in the relationship.
In the first of the new studies, 455 married participants (ages 18 to 77, with marriages ranging from less than one year to 55 years) were asked to independently list desired resolutions to a single current or ongoing conflict.
From those answers, 28 individual categories were identified, which researchers organised into six all-encompassing types of desired resolution.
After relinquished power, the desired behaviours from one's partner from most to least common were to show investment and stop adversarial behaviour, to communicate more, to give affection and to make an apology.
"We definitely respond to whether we gain or lose status. When we feel criticised, we are likely to have underlying concerns about a perceived threat to status, and when that happens, we usually want a partner simply to disengage and back off," Sanford said.
In a second study, participants completed a 28-item questionnaire measuring how much people wanted each of the categories of desired resolution that were identified in the first study.
This study included 498 participants (ages ranging from 19 to 81, with length of marriage ranging from less than one year to 51 years). The findings were consistent with the first study results, Sanford said.
The study was published in the Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)