Is this the best on show?

Image
Suveen K Sinha New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 29 2013 | 3:33 AM IST

Rankings and seedings show how women's tennis seems to be losing its competitive streak.

It is a peculiar situation now at the Australian Open, where of the top four women’s seeds, three — Serbia’s Jelena Jankovic, and the two Russians Dinara Safina and Elena Dementieva — have never won a Grand Slam. Jankovic is the first woman ever to finish a year as No. 1 without having won a Grand Slam title. Her best showing so far is her only Grand Slam final at last year’s US Open, which she lost to Serena Williams.

Ranking and seeding at Grand Slam tournaments in tennis have often been a contentious affair, not only at Wimbledon, where the tournament organisers sometimes ignore the ATP ranking, but also at the other three.

Chile’s Marcelo Rios was once the top-ranked male tennis player, but he never won a major. Ivan Lendl, Kim Clijsters and Amélie Mauresmo became became No 1 prior to winning a slam. The year in which Steffi Graf first became number one, Martina Navratilova dismissed the ranking since she had herself won the Wimbledon and US Open that year. Still, the trends in the men’s and women’s game are starkly different.

In the men’s section, the top four seeds are indeed the four players most likely to win. That cannot be said about the women’s draw, though. It is in part because of the Williams sisters.

Perhaps the last true number one in women’s tennis was Justine Henin, but she, too, was never certain to win against the sisters. Since Henin retired (a decision that surprised many), things have become more fluid. The Williams sisters have never tried to hide the fact that they have things to do outside the tennis court — fashion designing, for instance. So, they do not play enough on the WTA tour to collect the points that will give them the ranking due to them, and thereby the seeding at tournaments. So often they end up being dangerous floaters and the nightmare of the top seeds, who run into them early on. They cause little surprise when they win tournaments despite a low seeding or despite being unseeded.

From time to time, it appeared that a woman player would emerge to dominate the game like a true No1 does. Maria Sharapova, when she sashayed to her first Grand Slam title at Wimbledon at a young age, appeared most likely tofill that void. But she did not keep the early promise. Her shoulder keeps letting her down.

Ana Ivanovic seemed the next big hope. Given her pinup status, advertisers and marketers would have been salivating at the prospect of Ivanovic having an extended run at the top. But she looks a shadow of the player who reached the final in Melbourne last year.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 25 2009 | 12:00 AM IST

Next Story