The investigation wing of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) has cleared nine foreign airlines of cartelisation and abuse of dominant position charges, pressed by the Travel Agents Association of India (TAAI).
The report of the Director General (Investigations) was given to CCI on January 27, and this will form the basis of further hearings of the fair trade watchdog. The next hearing of CCI is on March 3.
TAAI had approached CCI in December 2009 after the airlines — Lufthansa German Airlines, Continental Airlines, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, Swiss International Airlines, Singapore Airlines, Air Canada, Air France and North West Airlines — announced their decision to end the practice of giving commissions to travel agents for ticketing services.
In its petition to CCI, the association alleged the decision to reduce the “Standard Agency Commission” from five per cent to zero from November 1, 2009 was an anti-competitive move. It also said the airlines were part of two international networks, Star Alliance Network and Sky Team Alliance, thereby pointing towards a potential cartelization that led to the joint decision.
After investigating the matter for over a year, CCI’s investigation wing concluded that with a 17 to 20 per cent combined market share, these airlines cannot be said to be dominant players in the international flying market from/to India. “The respondent airlines also do not enjoy any commercial advantage over their competitors, neither their consumers are dependent on them, nor they have acquired any monopoly. Therefore, the airline companies cannot be termed as dominant enterprises in the relevant market,” the report said.
The counsel for TAAI said the “commission is a legitimate right of a travel agent” and the Aircraft Act, 1934 defines “tariff” as any fare, rate or charge collected by airlines, which include commission payable to agents. He said TAAI had appealed to CCI to make the civil aviation ministry and the Director General of Civil Aviation parties to the case.
CCI had rejected at least two cases involving travel agents and airline companies at the primary stage itself. They have appealed against these orders in the Competition Appellate Tribunal.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
