Allotted land for Nano could be used for other purpose: Tatas

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 20 2013 | 1:24 AM IST

Tatas, whose small car project Nano, could not take off from Singur in West Bengal, today told the Supreme Court that the land allocated for the venture still belongs to it, which could be used for some other purpose.

"Tata's got lease. We are still there. We have spent crores of rupees and have our infrastructure there. It could be used for some other purpose," senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Tata Motors, submitted before a Bench comprising Justices R V Raveendran and A K Patnaik.

He said that despite having a lease deed for 90 years in its favour for 646 acres of land, there was no activity and the company was paying a rent of Rs 1 crore every year.

"We have lost Rs 500 crore. We have valid lease and are losing money," the senior advocate said.

Tata's submission came after those opposing the acquisition of fertile multi-crop agricultural land contended that since the company has moved the project outside Singur, the land should be returned to West Bengal government for giving it back to the farmers.

The counsel, appearing for West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation, said the title of the land was still with the Corporation and if Tata Motor's kept it unutilised then the land could be taken back.

The Bench, which wanted to fix the final hearing in the matter for March next year, changed its mind after it was pointed out that West Bengal is likely go for assembly elections by May.

At this point, the Bench said "let us decide whether the petition will survive by that time or not" and posted it hearing in May 2011.

The Bench was hearing a bunch of petitions challenging the Calcutta High Court's decision that upheld as legal the acquisition of fertile multi-crop agricultural land by the state government for Tata's Nano project.

Some civil right activists, lawyers and NGOs have appealed against the High Court verdict contending that acquisition of land was in violation of farmers’ rights guaranteed under the constitution.

The project was moved to Gujarat in 2008 due to political protests led by Trinamool Congress.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 29 2010 | 7:47 PM IST

Next Story