Amway India CEO taken into custody by AP's Khammam Police

Amway is facing nine criminal cases at various places in Andhra Pradesh

Press Trust of India Hyderabad
Last Updated : May 29 2014 | 11:41 AM IST
Amway India CEO William Scott Pinckney was today arrested by Khammam Police in Andhra Pradesh in connection with a criminal case filed against the direct-selling company.

Amway is facing nine criminal cases at various places in Andhra Pradesh and Pinckney had already been arrested by Kurnool Police on Monday and lodged in a prison in Kadapa.

However, Khammam police yesterday took Pinckney into custody from the Kadapa jail after it obtained a production warrant from a court in Khammam against Pinckney, who was wanted in a case filed by Khammam I Town police following a complaint by one G Rama Rao.

"A police team produced Pinckney before a court this morning in Khammam after taking him into custody from Kadapa. He has been shown arrested by Khammam Police. The court sent him into judicial custody and the escort police party is in the process of shifting him to Central Prison in Warangal," a senior police official told PTI over phone.

A court in Kurnool district had yesterday rejected Pinckney's bail petition and granted his five-day remand to Kurnool police. Even before Kurnool Police could take his custody from Kadapa prison, the Khammam Police had taken him into custody.

Now, the Kurnool Police is likely to move a court seeking directions to the Warangal Jail authorities for his custody.

Responding to a complaint alleging financial irregularities in Amway's operations, Pinckney was arrested in Gurgaon on Monday by the Kurnool Police.

Amway faces criminal complaints in Guntur, Vijayawada, Prakasam, Khammam, Warangal and Medak. In addition, there are three cases in Hyderabad.

According to police, the CID had registered a criminal case against Amway in 2006. The company approached Andhra Pradesh High Court seeking a declaration that its marketing scheme does not fall under the provisions of 'The Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978'.

But, the HC held that the scheme is an illegal 'Money Circulation Scheme' and falls within the definition of mischief, as described in the Act.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 29 2014 | 11:27 AM IST

Next Story