APL panel decides against Harsh Lodha re-appointment in MP Birla firms

No payment of profit linked to director's remuneration by all four listed companies to be made to him at AGMs for FY20

mp birla group
Last year, too, the APL Committee had decided not to support the re-appointment of Lodha as a director in Vindhya Telelinks and Birla Cable.
Ishita Ayan Dutt Kolkata
2 min read Last Updated : Aug 24 2020 | 11:59 PM IST
The committee of Administrators Pendente Lite (APL), appointed to protect the late Priyamvada Birla’s estate, has decided by a majority against re-appointment of Harsh Vardhan Lodha in M P Birla Group companies Birla Corporation and Universal Cables. Lodha is the chairman of both firms.

Apart from Lodha’s re-appointment, the APL committee decided against paying him profit-linked director’s remuneration from all four listed companies. The Birla Corporation AGM will be held on Tuesday.

The Birlas filed an application before the Calcutta High Court for implementation of the APL committee’s decisions. They also sought removal of Lodha from all positions within the M P Birla Group.
Since the single judge was in the middle of final hearings on last years’ AGMs of the companies, the judge did not pass an interim order on the application, which was challenged by the Birlas before the Division Bench of the High Court. The matter was heard by the Division Bench on Monday, which has directed that the resolutions regarding re-appointment of Lodha in Birla Corporation and Universal Cables and payment of profit-linked directors’ remuneration shall abide by the final orders in the applications being heard by the single judge Bench.

The Birla side said in a statement, “This leaves the stay of Harsh Vardhan Lodha in the four manufacturing companies — Vindhya Telelinks, Universal Cables, Birla Cable and Birla Corp­oration — at the mercy of the courts.” However, Debanjan Mandal, Lodha’s legal counsel, said, “This is an insignificant event. Prayer for adjournment of AGM was made in the petition along with several other prayers. But none were passed. The petition will be heard. There is no interim order.”

Last year, too, the APL committee had decided not to support the re-appointment of Lodha as a director in Vindhya Telelinks and Birla Cable.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Birla CorporationAGMsCalcutta High CourtVindhya Telelinks

Next Story