Asset quality review may have permanently reset banking system NPA

While NPA ratios have sharply moderated in the past two years, they are still way ahead of pre-AQR days

RBI
RBI
Hamsini Karthik
3 min read Last Updated : Jun 27 2019 | 10:30 PM IST
Just four years have gone by since asset quality review (AQR) was introduced by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to clean up the banking system. Yet, AQR has had a lingering impact in the system. While the exercise may go down the history as the most stringent one undertaken by a regulator in the Indian banking system to weed out toxic assets, numbers suggest that AQR may have permanently reset the non-performing asset (NPA) ratios for the banking system.

Sample this, in FY15, a year prior to the introduction of AQR, the system level gross and net NPA ratios stood at 4.3 per cent and 2.5 per cent, respectively (see chart). A year later, they climbed to 7.5 per cent and 4.4 per cent, respectively. The peak of the rigorous process was felt in FY18, when gross NPA ratio touched the 11.5 per cent mark. While the last fiscal year saw a significant easing of bad loans and rating firm Crisil expects the number to further melt to 8 per cent in FY20, experts say further easing of NPAs to pre-AQR days may not be possible anytime soon.

Though the net NPA ratio saw a sharper fall in FY19 after banks decided to hike provisions for bad loans, fresh accretion of trouble (defaults) and loan growth, which are on the mend, don’t favour a sharp improvement in NPA numbers.

“AQR came at a time when growth was anaemic for the system and hence it resulted in ballooning of NPA for banks. While loan growth has just come back, there’s new trouble brewing for banks and whether this leaves room for easing of stress is doubtful at the moment,” says an analyst with a foreign brokerage. Experts also point out that timely resolution of bad loans will play a crucial factor in easing of stress going forward. While the process so far has been quite staggering and hasn’t yielded meaty gains yet, if executed well, this could help reducing the NPA numbers going forward. There’s one comforting factor though. “IBC as a tool may result in higher recoveries than before. So, while ‘if’ and ‘when’ are the monitorable for pre-AQR levels of NPA, today’s quality of NPA is better than that in the past,” said Krishnan Sitaraman, senior director, CRISIL.

In all, AQR has certainly cleansed the system, but that has come at steep price and has completely reset the NPA levels of the system.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :asset quality review

Next Story