BCCI vs Deccan Chargers: HC rejects arbitrator's order

The case will now come up for final hearing before the high court on November 10

Image
BS Reporter Mumbai
Last Updated : Jan 25 2013 | 5:33 AM IST

The high court here, which had on Saturday stayed the status quo order of the arbitrator in the case between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd (DHCL), quashed it on Thursday, saying an arbitrator could not overrule an order passed by the court.

The court-appointed arbitrator, retired Supreme Court judge C K Thakkar, had passed a status quo order just after the high court had refused to give another extension to the beleaguered DCHL to furnish a bank guarantee of Rs 100 crore to BCCI to revoke the termination of the IPL franchise Deccan Chargers team.

BCCI moved the court on a non-working Saturday, and got a stay on the status quo order by Justice R D Dhanuka, on an appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Subsequently, BCCI also floated tender for a new IPL franchise to be selected from among 12 cities.

The case will now come up for final hearing before the high court on November 10.

Interestingly, DCHL claims that it has already got a buyer for the team in Mumbai-based real estate firm Kamla Landmarc. However, the termination of the franchise contract will mean the financial woes of the cash-strapped company will not resolve soon.

The case so far
The BCCI called an emergency IPL governing council meeting in Chennai and decided to terminate the contract of Deccan Charger, after the latter rejected the only bid for the team. However, DCHL, the promoter of the franchise, moved the Bombay High Court challenging the termination.

After hearing the counsels of bother the parties, the court asked DCHL to give an unconditional bank guarantee of Rs 100 crore to BCCI, if it wants to play in the next season of IPL within 10 days. The court also appointed an arbitrator and has given a three-month period to resolve the issue. Additionally, the court said that if DCHL fails to furnish the bank guarantee, the termination stands.

DCHL got the first extension for three days. However, when it once again asked for an extension in deadline to furnish the bank guarantee, the court rejected it. On the same day, DCHL announced that Kamla Landmarc has agreed to buy the team.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 19 2012 | 12:25 AM IST

Next Story