According to a recent communication of the department of telecommunications (DoT), the telecom ministry is discussing if the new shareholding structure would be permissible under the licence agreement.
Qualcomm Asia Pacific, which had a 74 per cent stake in the venture, now holds just 6.55 per cent equity, while Airtel acquired a 93.45 per cent stake. At the time of buying the broadband wireless access (BWA) spectrum, the company was 13 per cent owned by Global Holding Corp, and Tulip Telecom had a 13 per cent stake, while Qualcomm Asia Pacific had the remaining 74 per cent stake.
Qualcomm did not respond to queries from Business Standard.
DoT is also not sure whether the licensee needs to maintain the shareholding structure which it had submitted at the time of acquiring the licence for the entire period of the licence term. According to the notice inviting applications (NIA), the successful bidder of he BWA spectrum should have at least 26 per cent equity in the company, directly or indirectly. While Qualcomm had acquired the spectrum initially, the same was later sold to Airtel in phases.
As there is no clarity in NIA, one official has noted that the department may consider submitting a proposal giving various opinions in the context of 100 per cent foreign direct investment is allowed in the sector.
In a separate deal, Mukesh Ambani-led Reliance Industries had bought a 95 per cent stake of Himachal Futuristic Communications Ltd that had acquired BWA spectrum through auction.
NIA also mentions that the licensee may, under intimation to licensor (here DoT), replace a promoter or promoters by another, as stipulated, if the Indian promoter acquires the foreign promoter’s stake and it may also transfer equity between Indian promoters or persons including Indian employees of the company.
The DoT has also sought comments from different members on whether there is a provision for change of shareholding pattern or equity structure of the licensee in the NIA. NIA notes the successful bidders are to hold a minimum holding of 26 per cent in the new entrant nominee internet service provider or unified service access licensee company at the time of acquiring the licence. In such cases, a successful bidder cannot be made liable for the performance of the bid obligations and an amendment in NIA to this effect shall be necessary.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)