Infosys did not directly reply to a query on whether the case was expected to be settled on Wednesday and if it had to pay such a hefty fine. But it said it was not involved in any systematic visa abuse in the US. “In response to reports attributed to Justice Department officials, Infosys is in the process of completing a civil resolution with the government regarding its investigation of visa issues and I-9 documentation errors. The resolution has not been finalised,” the firm said in a statement. “Infosys denies any claims of systemic visa fraud, misuse of visas for competitive advantage, or immigration abuse,” it added.
The WSJ report said the US authorities were likely to say the Indian IT services major had illegally placed workers on visitor visas, rather than work visas, at clients across its largest market.
The US Justice Department and the Homeland Security Department have been investigating Infosys’ visa practices for over two years. The probe had been triggered by allegations the Bangalore-based firm used business travel documents to place Indian employees on temporary positions in American companies.
Interestingly, Infosys had earlier this month made a provision of exactly $35 million for settlement of the case, which dates back to May 2011, when the company had been issued a sub-poena by the US authorities asking it to furnish details of its business visa use. The provision included legal costs associated with the probe, the company had said.
On its $35-million provision, Infosys CFO Rajiv Bansal had told Business Standard earlier this month: “Based on the way the discussions are today, we felt it was necessary to make the provision. Right now, the discussions are on and based on the assessment of those, we have made the provision,”.
“The fact is, you have to make certain accounting provisions, depending on the situation. We might not use a dollar out of it, or we may spend more,” he had said.
The WSJ report said the US government authorities had found Infosys brought an unknown number of employees for long-term stays in the country on inexpensive and easy-to-get B-1 visas (which cover short business visits) in place of H-1B visas, which are generally hard to get.
The resolution to the case would only include civil penalties and constitute a full resolution to the case, the report added.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)