Is penalising brand ambassadors a fair move?

Experts say it is unfair to impose hefty fines on celebrity endorsers who are not responsible for the brand and marketing strategy

Brands learn to play the game
Viveat Susan Pinto Mumbai
Last Updated : Aug 31 2016 | 12:37 PM IST
The government's move to penalise brand endorsers with hefty fines for making misleading claims in ads is unfair, say brand and marketing experts. While due-diligence levels are expected to go up if it becomes law, most celebrity managers that Business Standard spoke to fear that the move could actually discourage brand endorsements.
 
“Last year, state food regulators had come down hard on Maggi's brand ambassadors both past and present for being part of ads that misled consumers about the product. This was at the height of the Maggi controversy and was perceived even then as being inappropriate by most experts and observers,” said Indranil Das Blah, COO, Kwan Entertainment & Marketing Solutions that manages the endorsements of a number of sports and entertainment celebrities.
 
“Brand endorsers are merely the face of the brand, they are not drivers of the manufacturing and marketing strategy. How can they be held responsible for the claims made by a marketer in an ad?" he asks.
 
Dhruv Jha, general manager (content & experiences), IPG Mediabrands, said there “…cannot be a blanket law for celebrity endorsements. Products go through several regulatory checks and a celebrity is aware of this when endorsing a brand. How can he be then held responsible if the product turns out to be faulty?"
 
In a meeting on Tuesday that included Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and a few others, it was decided that brand ambassadors would be fined up to Rs 1 crore if they were found making tall claims in ads. 
 
A jail term, as was previously suggested by a Parliamentary Committee, was not considered by the ministers since it was found to be too harsh. At the meeting yesterday, it was decided that it was better to hike the penalty to dissuade false and misleading brand endorsements. 
 
The Parliamentary Committee overseeing the revamped Consumer Protection Bill, which is expected to be tabled in Parliament soon, had proposed in April that first-time offenders be handed down a fine of Rs 10 lakh or a jail-term of two years, or both. For second-time offenders, the proposal was to increase the fine to Rs 50 lakh or a five-year jail term. 
 
A final decision, however, on the matter is expected to be taken shortly by the group of ministers before it makes its way to Parliament.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 31 2016 | 12:32 PM IST

Next Story