The Joint Plant Committee (JPC) has contested the Geethakrishnan Committee's recommendation saying that it is not a constituent of the steel ministry.
In a detailed note to the ministry, the JPC has pointed out that in various documents, including the annual report submitted in Parliament every year by the ministry, the organisation of JPC has never been mentioned as a constituent of the steel ministry.
Further, the Union government, while responding to the allegations levelled by the Department of Commerce of the US government, had declared that JPC is an independent authority controlling the steel development fund (SDF).
Also Read
The Expenditure Reforms Committee (ERC) under the chairmanship of Geethakrishnan, former secretary (finance), had recommended downsizing of different government departments, including steel. The report recommended winding up of the JPC. At present, the total staff strength of the JPC is 265.
JPC was constituted in 1964 as an autonomous committee drawing powers from clause 17B of the Iron & Steel (Control) Order, 1956. JPC officials said it is an independent body set up by the Union government and has the power to discharge its own functions.
According to JPC officials, the organisation has never received any budgetary support from the ministry of steel. "The main source of funds for JPC is the JPC Cess Fund, which was built up with contributions from the consumers."
JPC is mainly a body of the producers, with the development commissioner for Iron & Steel as chairman, and six members from the steel producers and the Railways. The latter is represented as a significant consumer.
At present, the JPC Cess Fund approximately comes to Rs 250 crore. "Our expenditure is around Rs 7 crore, funded from returns on investment of Rs 25 crore. JPC has never been supported through budgetary resources of the Union government" JPC officials added.
"Where fierce competition exists for marketing of their products, and some even resorting to undercutting, it is not possible for the producers to unite for a common cause like market development, technology development and other issues. This has been clearly established through formation of organisations, such as Indofar, which was later disbanded," the officials added.
The Geethakrishnan Committee report says the main functions hitherto carried out by JPC have ceased to exit after the decontrol of the steel industry in 1992, and needs to be wound up. "A maximum of three months could be provided for completing the winding up process in an orderly manner"it says.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
