It said the Supreme Court had refused to interfere with its earlier orders issued in May 2012 permitting Lanco Hills to alienate, transfer and sell the properties in the project when it heard an application by the Wakf Board for restraining the same.
Last year the Supreme Court stayed the orders issued by the Wakf Tribunal as well as the division bench of Andhra Pradesh high court, which stopped Lanco Hills from selling the properties to third parties following the claim of ownership over the land by the Wakf board.
The apex court had ruled that in the event the title dispute decided in favour of the Wakf Board, then the state government can compensate it either monetarily or by providing an alternative land as the company had acquired the land from the government.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
