“I cannot talk about it (shareholding pattern) as nothing has been finalised yet,” said Reeta Singh, managing director with Mesco Steel.
Posco officials were not available for comment regarding the MoU with Mesco.
Also Read
However, the issue of majority shareholding will continue to pose threat to the project as a similar attempt by Posco earlier could not make any headway. Posco had entered into a pact with Steel Authority of India Ltd (SAIL) in 2007 and again in 2009 to install a Finex technology plant in the latter’s Bokaro steel plant premises. The JV project with SAIL envisaged 3 million tonne steel capacity at an investment of Rs 16,000 crore. The project, however, could not progress with both parties bickering over majority shareholding and the MoU expired in 2011.
Industry observers and analysts said no company would be willing to have a minority stake after sharing technology. “The Mesco-Posco deal is not for sourcing of funds only unlike the case of Bhushan Steel and (Japanese steelmaker) Sumitomo deal. Since Posco is willing to share its technology, it is likely be keen on having majority share in the proposed JV with Mesco,” said Gunjan Agarwal, senior analyst with CRU, a business intelligence firm.
Mesco has been in search of fresh capital for expanding its 1.2 million tonne pig iron plant at Kalinganagar to 3.5 million tonne a year integrated steel making facility. The company was looking to raise around $400 million via external commercial borrowings.
Partnering with Posco would help Mesco to produce steel at a lower cost because Finex technology uses iron ore fines, which is being exported due to lack of use in the country and also normal coal which is available abundantly in the state. Earlier Mesco, which has blast furnace but no coke making facility, was in talks with Jindal Stainless Steel (JSL) to produce steel jointly by using the latter’s coke making facility. But JSL did not accept the offer of Mesco. For Posco, collaboration with Mesco would give it access to latter’s captive iron ore mine and existing land at Kalinganagar industrial complex as it is yet to make any significant progress on its proposed 12 million tonne steel plant at Paradip because it is still awaiting allotment of captive mine and clearances to get ownership of land.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)