| "The respondent is obliged to refund the amount realised by encashing the bank guarantee and performance guarantee together with interest as well as refund of 10 per cent licence fee paid by the firm at the time of signing of the agreement as advance together with interest," the company said in its petition. The court appointed arbitrator SC Agrawal, in its May 20 order, had rejected the company's claim holding it liable for non-commissioning of radio paging services. Besides, the arbitrator had held that the deductions made by DoT were correct. |
| The petition had held the Centre's action as legal and had observed that Modi Tele had failed to pay the licence fee as per the terms of the license and the Centre was entitled to invoke the bank guarantees as well as the performance guarantees for recovery. |
| According to the petition, Modi Telecommunications was awarded license for installation, networking, maintenance and operations of the radio paging services in Rajasthan circle (46 sites in 22 locations) for a period of 10 years. |
| Under the terms of license and laws governing telecommunications, the company had to get the mandatory approval from Standing Advisory Committee on Frequency Allocations (SACFA), an apex body in the ministry of communications responsible for frequency allocations, coordination of various wireless users in the country, etc, it said. |
| According to the company, prior to getting of the necessary SACFA clearance, the respondent without taking notice of delays in granting approval had stuck to its demand of license fee 15 per cent for first quarter and remittance of dues alongwith interest. |
| The illegal act was evident from the fact that the respondent without considering its own faults and delays invoked bank guarantee by addressing a letter to Indusind Bank on March 18, 1997 and terminated its license in February 2000 effective from March, 1997, the petitioner said. |
| The financial bank guarantees were also encashed in March 2001 and May 2001 after the stay granted by TRAI was vacated, it added. |
| "The non-commissioning was on account of reasons that were totally within the control of DoT and other government agencies and not on account of any acts of omission or commission on the part of the company," the petition said |
| According to the company, SACFA approval was not granted till the stipulated date, so the commencement of paging services did not arise at all. Neither a formal letter/notice of termination was given, it said. |
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
