Sasan Power loses plea to avoid international arbitration

Division bench upholds district court's decision, rules in favour of North America Coal Corporation

Sasan Power loses plea to avoid international arbitration
BS Reporter Chennai
Last Updated : Oct 09 2015 | 12:31 PM IST
A division bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court has upheld the district court's order dismissing Sasan Power's plea for an injunction against international arbitration with the Indian subsidiary of US-based North America Coal Corporation (NACC).

Sasan Power argued that the dispute between the two Indian companies should be decided by the Indian judicial system and not the arbitral tribunal in London under the auspices of the International Council for Arbitration (ICC).

North America Coal Corporation, on the other hand, argued that it has to be heard at the ICC.

Hearing both sides, Justice Rajendra Menon and Justice Sushil Kumar Gupta observed that when parties have agreed to resolve all their disputes by arbitration, they can't be permitted to avoid arbitration. 

"Accordingly, in the facts and circumstances, we find no error in the order passed by the learned district judge, warranting reconsideration," said the Bench.

Responding to an e-mail seeking the company's response on the division bench order, Reliance spokesperson said, "We cannot comment as the matter is sub-judice".

Sasan Power has been incorporated to set up 3,960 MW ultra mega project near Sasan in Singrauli district of Madhya Pradesh. 

It had executed a Memorandum of Understanding with NACC-US for technical consultancy related to coal mining and related activities. Based on this, in April 2011, the US firm assigned its rights, liabilities and obligations under the agreement to its Indian subsidiary. However, disputes started arising between the parties and NACC-India issued a letter of termination in respect of the associate agreement. Acting through its foreign law advisers Jones Day, it filed a request for arbitration with the ICC, claiming a compensation of over $17 million along with compound interest.

Sasan Power challenged this and filed a petition with the district court, Singrauli, which initially issued an ex-parte stay against ICC intervention. However, after hearing both the parties, by an order dated March 19, 2015, Sasan Power's petition was dismissed. Sasan Power then filed an appeal before the division bench.

Anirudh Krishnan, counsel for NACC India submitted that it was permissible for two Indian parties to have a foreign seat and this is was contemplated within the scheme of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 

Sasan Power is a fully owned subsidiary of Anil Ambani-led Reliance Power Ltd.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 09 2015 | 11:32 AM IST

Next Story